Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 19, 2016Clinical and Vaccine ImmunologyOpen Access

Immunoglobulin M for Acute Infection: True or False?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MLMarie L. LandryYale University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Marie L. Landry (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9a02f7f18ff2fefa3c07ehttps://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00211-16
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biotin IgM Antibodies in Human Blood: A Previously Unknown Factor Eliciting False Results in Biotinylation-Based Immunoassays2012 · 28 citations
  2. 2Performance of the Epstein-Barr Virus and Herpes Simplex Virus Immunoglobulin M Assays on the Liaison Platform with Sera from Patients Displaying Acute Parvovirus B19 Infection2009 · 11 citations
  3. 3Multiple Factors Contribute to Positive Results for Hepatitis A Virus Immunoglobulin M Antibody2012 · 16 citations
  4. 4Manual of Clinical Microbiology.1980 · 14,441 citations
  5. 5Coexistence of IgM antihepatitis A virus and IgM antihepatitis E virus in acute viral hepatitis: a prospective, multicentre study in Korea2011 · 17 citations