Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An optimal high-speed train nose design was formulated to reduce aerodynamic drag, mitigate tunnel micro-pressure waves, and improve crosswind safety. Using the vehicle modeling function, the EMU-320 nose shape was derived and applied as the base model for the optimal design. Following the initial optimization stage aimed at reducing aerodynamic drag, the second stage of optimization was conducted, using the results of the first stage as constraints, to further reduce tunnel micro-pressure waves and enhance crosswind safety. In the first stage, the aerodynamic drag was reduced by 8.7% due to the pointed nose shape. In the second stage, a Pareto front of optimal shapes was derived to reduce tunnel micro-pressure waves and improve crosswind safety, ensuring that the aerodynamic drag did not exceed the optimum achieved in the first stage by more than 1.5%. This two-stage multi-objective optimization is expected to be effectively utilized in the optimal design of high-speed train shapes that meet the intended purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: