Pavitt's taxonomy of innovating firms, published sixteen years ago, has become a classic paper in the field of technological change. This article discusses some of its characteristics and proposes some minor and not so minor extensions and revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daniele Archibugi (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: