PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 8, 2015Biostatistics119 citationsOpen Access

Large sample inference for a win ratio analysis of a composite outcome based on prioritized components

View Full Paper
IBIonut BebuJLJohn M. Lachin

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Composite outcomes are common in clinical trials, especially for multiple time-to-event outcomes (endpoints). The standard approach that uses the time to the first outcome event has important limitations. Several alternative approaches have been proposed to compare treatment versus control, including the proportion in favor of treatment and the win ratio. Herein, we construct tests of significance and confidence intervals in the context of composite outcomes based on prioritized components using the large sample distribution of certain multivariate multi-sample U-statistics. This non-parametric approach provides a general inference for both the proportion in favor of treatment and the win ratio, and can be extended to stratified analyses and the comparison of more than two groups. The proposed methods are illustrated with time-to-event outcomes data from a clinical trial.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bebu et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9b77f5e5bcb4e3b837ba8https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxv032
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper