Why the study?
Impedance is measured by cardiovascular implantable electronic devices to assess lead integrity and performance, but present impedance measurement provides a specific yet insensitive diagnostic, particularly for shock circuit insulation breaches.
Does impedance measurement accurately diagnose lead malfunction in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Does impedance measurement accurately diagnose lead malfunction in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Current impedance measurements provide specific but insensitive diagnostics for CIED lead malfunction, emphasizing the need for complementary oversensing diagnostics and new measurement methods.
Impedance monitoring alone risks missing CIED lead malfunctions; leaves open need for sensitive complementary diagnostics in future studies.
Impedance is the ratio of voltage to current in an electrical circuit. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices measure impedance to assess the structural integrity electrical performance of leads, typically using subthreshold pulses. We review determinants of impedance, how it is measured, variation in clinically measured pacing and high-voltage impedance and impedance trends as a diagnostic for lead failure and lead-device connection problems. We consider the differential diagnosis of abnormal impedance and the approach to the challenging problem of a single, abnormal impedance measurement. Present impedance provides a specific but insensitive diagnostic. For pacing circuits, we review the complementary roles of impedance and more sensitive oversensing diagnostics. Shock circuits lack a sensitive diagnostic. This deficiency is particularly important for insulation breaches, which may go undetected and present with short circuits during therapeutic shocks. We consider new methods for measuring impedance that may increase sensitivity for insulation breaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Swerdlow et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: