Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports informed algorithm selection in cardiac mapping; leaves open rigorous head-to-head validation across contexts.
Measurements of cardiac conduction velocity provide valuable functional and structural insight into the initiation and perpetuation of cardiac arrhythmias, in both a clinical and laboratory context. The interpretation of activation wavefronts and their propagation can identify mechanistic properties of a broad range of electrophysiological pathologies. However, the sparsity, distribution and uncertainty of recorded data make accurate conduction velocity calculation difficult. A wide range of mathematical approaches have been proposed for addressing this challenge, often targeted towards specific data modalities, species or recording environments. Many of these algorithms require identification of activation times from electrogram recordings which themselves may have complex morphology or low signal-to-noise ratio. This paper surveys algorithms designed for identifying local activation times and computing conduction direction and speed. Their suitability for use in different recording contexts and applications is assessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cantwell et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: