This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
T e purpose of this review is to assess the nature and mag-nitudes of the dominant forces in protein folding. Since proteins are only marginally stable at room temperature, ’ no type of molecular interaction is unimportant, and even small interactions can contribute significantly (positively or nega-tively) to stability (Alber, 1989a,b; Matthews, 1987a,b). However, the present review aims to identify only the largest forces that lead to the structural features of globular proteins: their extraordinary compactness, their core of nonpolar resi-dues, and their considerable amounts of internal architecture. This review explores contributions to the free energy of folding arising from electrostatics (classical charge repulsions and ion pairing), hydrogen-bonding and van der Waals in-teractions, intrinsic propensities, and hydrophobic interactions. An earlier review by Kauzmann (1959) introduced the im-
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ken A. Dill (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: