Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 16, 2012Psychological Science

Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

LJLeslie K. JohnHarvard UniversityGeorge LoewensteinGeorge LoewensteinChitose Institute of Science and TechnologyDPDražen PrelecPharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Research Iberia (Spain)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

John et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9db6b84371aa676a3c33dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Mystery of the Mozart Effect: Failure to Replicate1999 · 238 citations
  2. 2How the case against the MMR vaccine was fixed2011 · 352 citations
  3. 3The case for motivated reasoning.1990 · 8,411 citations
  4. 4Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research2005 · 1,480 citations
  5. 5Medical specialists and pharmaceutical industry‐sponsored research: a survey of the Australian experience2005 · 53 citations