Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ru2P/SiO2 and RuP/SiO2 catalysts were prepared by the temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) of uncalcined precursors containing hypophosphite ion (H2PO2–) as the phosphorus source. The Ru2P/SiO2 and RuP/SiO2 catalysts had small average particle sizes (∼4 nm) and high CO chemisorption capacities (90–110 μmol/g). The Ru phosphide catalysts exhibited similar or higher furan (C4H4O) hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) activities than did a Ru/SiO2 catalyst, and the phosphide catalysts favored C4 hydrocarbon products while the Ru metal catalyst produced primarily C3 hydrocarbons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bowker et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: