Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative case study identifies multisectoral priorities for improving health resilience in vulnerable communities, suggesting significant implications for climate adaptation.
The 2022 floods in Pakistan affected 33 million people and destroyed over 1,400 health facilities, highlighting limited disaster management capacities, systemic fragility, and the need for improved preparedness and resilience to extreme weather events (EWE). However, sectoral disconnects hinder understanding community mobilization’s role in healthcare resilience and coordination across response capacities. Therefore, there exists a substantial opportunity to explore the potential of community-driven resilience, based on local priorities, in preparing for and adapting to climate risks. To identify multisectoral priorities for strengthening preparedness for extreme weather events in District Badin, Sindh Pakistan. A qualitative case study design was employed in this study, grounded in a participatory research framework. Overall, 24stakeholders were engaged at the district, health system, and community levels through three co-production workshops and nine key informant interviews. Participatory tools included problem tree analysis, visioning exercises, and retrospective response analysis. Usingmultiple data sources, stakeholders identified three interconnected priorities that form a multisectoral preparedness framework: (1) Strengthening Climate-Responsive Healthcare highlighting the need for better communication between climate and health services and enhancing capacities of health professionals; (2) Water Security and Health Resilience emphasizing the link between clean water and health, and the role of improved behaviors and knowledge as coping mechanisms; and (3) Enhancing Preparedness Approaches advocating innovative and traditional channels for coordination, early warning, and community mobilization. This study highlights the value of co-production by demonstrating that inclusive, iterative engagement processes can enhance the trust, and shared ownership of climate-health preparedness. While our findings offer a replicable framework for operationalizing climate adaptation in district-level health systems, there is need for long term follow up evaluation to assess implications for multi sectoral preparedness. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: