Key result
Catheter ablation improves abnormal RV-PA coupling in AF patients only if AF does not recur.
Why the study?
Does catheter ablation improve right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in patients with atrial fibrillation and normal left ventricular ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=164)
Does catheter ablation improve right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in patients with atrial fibrillation and normal left ventricular ejection fraction?
Catheter ablation improves right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in patients with atrial fibrillation and preserved ejection fraction, provided they remain free from recurrent arrhythmia.
May support ablation for RV-PA coupling in AF with preserved LVEF if AF-free; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a predominant risk factor for heart failure, even in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Emerging evidence suggests the significance of right ventricular‐pulmonary artery (RV‐PA) uncoupling in heart failure occurrence. We aimed to elucidate the prevalence and associated factors of RV‐PA uncoupling and the efficacy of catheter ablation (CA) for RV‐PA adaptation in patients with AF without history of heart failure. Methods: We studied 164 patients with AF free of heart failure who had normal left ventricular ejection fraction and underwent first CA. Echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CA. RV‐PA coupling was calculated from the ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to PA systolic pressure. Abnormal RV‐PA coupling was defined as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PA systolic pressure <0.70 mm/mm Hg. Results: Among the participants, 32 (19.5%) patients were classified as having abnormal RV‐PA coupling. The abnormal RV‐PA coupling group was older, and had higher prevalence of persistent AF, higher CRP (C‐reactive protein) and B‐type natriuretic peptide levels than the normal RV‐PA coupling group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that an elevated CRP level was significantly associated with RV‐PA uncoupling ( P =0.004). At 6 months after CA, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PA systolic pressure was significantly improved but was still lower in the abnormal RV‐PA coupling group than in the normal RV‐PA coupling group ( P =0.047). Furthermore, improvement of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PA systolic pressure after CA was observed only in patients without recurrent AF. Conclusions: Approximately 20% of patients with AF with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction had abnormal RV‐PA coupling, and CA improved RV‐PA coupling status, whereas its benefits were observed in patients free from recurrent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirose et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (n=164). Catheter ablation vs. Baseline was evaluated on Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to PA systolic pressure ratio). Catheter ablation improved right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in AF patients, though at 6 months it remained lower in the 19.5% with abnormal baseline coupling (P=0.047 vs normal coupling).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: