Introduces a refined algorithm that enhances solution quality in transportation problems, suggesting improved efficiency.
This study introduces a deterministic fractional-penalty refinement of Vogel’s Approximation Method (VAM) for generating high-quality initial basic feasible solutions (IBFS) in classical transportation problems. Unlike the traditional additive regret measure employed in VAM, the proposed method uses a multiplicative contrast ratio between the two smallest admissible costs in each row and column. This modification preserves the allocation structure of VAM while introducing scale-invariant prioritization that improves sensitivity to relative cost differences.The method was evaluated on thirty-four benchmark transportation problems drawn from the literature and self-constructed large-scale instances (up to 10×20). Performance was assessed using percentage optimality gaps relative to optimal solutions obtained via the Stepping–Stone and MODI procedures. Across all instances, the proposed approach achieved a mean optimality gap of 2.78%, compared to 5.22% for classical VAM, 14.97% for the Least Cost Method (LCM), and 45.78% for the Northwest Corner Method (NWCM). Dispersion of deviations was also reduced, indicating improved robustness across heterogeneous cost structures Statistical validation confirms the improvement over VAM: the paired t-test yielded t=−3.17 (p=0.00163, one-sided), and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test produced p=6.10×10−5. Computational experiments further show that the refinement does not increase runtime relative to classical IBFS procedures.The proposed method therefore constitutes a structured enhancement of VAM that improves initial solution quality while maintaining computational simplicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: