Automated yield prediction models improve crop productivity using varying nitrogen and irrigation rates, suggesting enhanced agricultural practices.
The number of kernels per ear is a key yield parameter that reflects the effects of breeding and agronomic management practices on crop productivity. However, conventional manual counting is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. This study evaluated the performance of six YOLO models, trained from scratch and fine-tuned, alongside a Faster R-CNN model, for automated kernel detection and counting from manually harvested field corn ear images. Model performance was assessed for predicting the yield and harvest index (HI) of field corn under varying nitrogen and irrigation rates. Results show that models trained with fine-tuning consistently outperform those trained from scratch in both accuracy and computational speed. Among all tested YOLO models, YOLOv11x achieved the highest performance, with a precision of 0.978, a recall of 0.968, a latency of 4.8 ms, and a prediction coefficient of determination (R2pred) of 0.858 for the test set and 0.890 for cross-year datasets. The YOLOv8x model ranked second, whereas YOLOv10x was the worst-performing model. Compared to YOLO, Faster R-CNN performed poorly. Yield and HI predictions using YOLOv11x achieved R2 values of 0.881 and 0.758, respectively, and captured treatment effects. Overall, the findings demonstrate that YOLO-based architecture is highly effective for detecting kernels and predicting yield in precision agriculture applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghimire et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: