This analysis compares five anomaly detection techniques for detecting targets in high noise conditions, indicating the best performing methods.
Event-based vision sensors (EVSs) provide unique frequency analysis opportunities due to their event data output and high temporal resolution. Anomaly detection methods used in hyperspectral analysis can be used on the event frequency spectra to detect targets. However, the introduction of a strong, flickering interfering source can reduce the EVS sensitivity and obscure targets of interest. Previous work presented a method showing that targets could still be detected through an overwhelming source using frequency analysis, background suppression, and statistical filtering. This paper extends that research and compares the ability of five different eigenanalysis anomaly detection methods (principal component background suppression (PCBS) with peak threshold detection, Mahalanobis distance (MD) detector, complementary subspace detector (CSD), Reed–Xiaoli (RX) detector, and subspace Reed–Xiaoli (SSRX) detector) to detect targets in a high noise environment. The PCBS, MD, and CSD detectors performed well and were able to detect the targets through the overwhelming source. The PCBS detector had the best performance at low false-alarm rates (a > 400% detection probability increase at a false-alarm probability of 10−5). While the MD and CSD detectors had the best detection at higher false-alarm probabilities (approximately 7 × 10−2), the MD detector had a sub-second execution time. Depending on the application, the PCBS or MD detector are the best choice out of these five methods to detect targets in this type of high noise environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnston et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: