Erratum reports an omission in a practitioner-authored article, indicating the editorial review process involved.
It has come to the attention of the publisher that article Cunningham, I. (2026), “The rise of learning and development – forty years of change”, Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, Vol. 40 No. 2 pp. 1–3, Link to the cited article, omitted a sentence indicating that the article is practitioner-authored.The following sentence should have been included:“This article is practitioner-authored and has been subject to rigorous editorial review. Practitioner articles are not subject to the double-anonymised peer review applied to all academic-authored articles in this journal”.This error was introduced during the article publication process, for which the publisher apologises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: