This analysis examines the interplay of identity and memory politics in shaping constitutional narratives by populists in power, suggesting significant implications.
In this work I shall focus on contexts in which the element of identity politics is central to the construction of the friend/enemy dichotomy that characterises the dichotomous, anti-elitist and moralising approach typical of populism. For the purposes of this article, I shall deal with the constitutional law aspects, specifically examining the relationship between memory politics and identity politics in shaping the constitutional counter-narratives advanced by populists in power.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giuseppe Martinico (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: