Comparative analysis reveals daytime and overnight strategies outperform passive methods in sector ETFs, indicating potential benefits.
This study examines overnight vs. daytime static and momentum strategies applied to ten sector Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) over a 27-year period from 1999 to 2025. Our findings reveal that several such strategies, particularly reversal strategies, consistently outperform static and buy-and-hold strategies. This outperformance decreases significantly when transaction costs are taken into account. We consider two transaction-cost scenarios (1 bps vs. 2 bps), which are industry standards for institutional and retail investors, respectively. We provided a detailed analysis of volatility and drawdowns. Our results indicate that by considering night and daytime separately, it is possible to outperform passive strategies for most sector ETFs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salotra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: