Comparative research enhances synthetic graph methods for better social bot detection in edge-deficient networks.
Accurate social bot detection relies on simulated data to alleviate the scarcity of labeled real-world datasets. Synthetic graph data serves as the core training resource for detection models within simulated data; nevertheless, edge deficiency in real social networks (induced by privacy constraints and data collection limitations) gives rise to “pseudo-isolated nodes” and distorts the quality of synthetic graph data. Furthermore, mainstream data-driven synthetic graph generation methods lack systematic and credible comparative analyses. To tackle these problems, this study optimizes two representative synthetic graph generation approaches (the Chung-Lu model and the Random Classifier-based Multi-Hop (RCMH) sampling + diffusion model) and puts forward an edge completion strategy grounded in sociological theories. Multiple groups of comparative experiments are conducted to assess the performance of the improved methods and the edge completion strategy. Experimental results demonstrate that the “interest + social association” edge completion strategy achieves an F1-score (F1) of 0.7051, and the improved sampling + diffusion model integrated with edge completion reaches an F1-score of 0.7071, which performs better than traditional and unmodified methods to a certain extent. This work preliminarily enhances the reliability of synthetic graph generation methods and provides relatively high-quality synthetic social graph data for social bot detection. It should be noted that the proposed methods are validated solely on Twitter-derived datasets, and their effectiveness remains to be verified in cross-platform adaptation and dynamic social network scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: