⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

March 31, 2026Korean Journal of Public Administration

Why Do Scores Diverge: Weighting Preferences and Evaluation Disagreement in Preliminary Feasibility Studies

Geunhyuk Choi Bong-Hwan Kim

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The central aim is to analyze the causes of score discrepancies in preliminary feasibility studies and their relationship with weighting preferences.
Analyzed evaluation scores in preliminary feasibility studies.
Examined the relationship between weighting preferences and score discrepancies.
Set highest and lowest scores as dependent variables for analysis.
Lower economic weighting correlates with higher maximum scores.
Higher policy weighting leads to higher maximum scores.
Higher economic weighting associated with higher minimum scores.
Differences in judgment styles related to evaluation item types were observed.

Implication

This analysis investigates how weighting preferences cause evaluation score discrepancies, suggesting improvements for fairness.

Abstract

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e63478050d08c1b7675f https://doi.org/10.24145/kjpa.64.1.1

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Indicators for Participating Firms in the Work-Learning Dual SystemOriginal Research · 2026
2Study on the Importance of and Satisfaction with the Quality of Estate Planning ServiceOriginal Research · 2026
3An Exploratory Empirical Analysis of a Financial Ratio Integrated Scoring StructureOriginal Research · 2026
4Evidence-Weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Support for Subjective Quality Assessment Under Sparse and Unbalanced InformationOriginal Research · 2026
5Effects of Distributional Assumptions in Stochastic Frontier Models on Efficiency-Based Unit TargetingOriginal Research · 2026

Basic Statistical Methods in Determining Criteria Weights2024
Utility Effectiveness, Composite Indicators and ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Models: How Important Are Preferences When Evaluating the Performance of Innovation Systems?2026
The Intricate Nature of Evaluability: How Attribute Framing, Magnitude, and Reference Point Moderate Calibration and Bias2026
Cohort effects on Turnover Intentions among Public Servants: Empirical Evidence from Millennial and Gen Z Public Servants in KoreaKorean Journal of Public Administration · 2026
Kim Ok-gyun’s Government Reform Practices during the Period of Korea's Transition to ModernityKorean Journal of Public Administration · 2026

KMore from Korean Journal of Public Administration