Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study evaluates acetabular development and suggests follow-up protocols for infants with edge blunting, indicating implications for clinical practice.
Graf-based ultrasound (US) is widely used to screen for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), a common orthopedic disorder, in infants. However, isolated acetabular edge blunting is occasionally reported, despite normal alpha and beta angles and adequate femoral head coverage. The clinical significance and follow-up strategies for this isolated finding remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate acetabular development in infants with isolated acetabular edge blunting and propose a rational follow-up protocol. This retrospective study reviewed 5,190 reports on hip USs performed between June 2023 and July 2024. A total of 211 infants with isolated acetabular edge blunting and normal alpha-beta angles were included in this study. Demographic data, follow-up US results, and pelvic radiographs taken after 6 months were analyzed. Acetabular index (AI) angles and femoral head ossification center areas were measured and statistically compared. Of 211 infants, 144 (68.2%) were female. Spontaneous normalization to Graf type 1 A was observed in 58.7% of patients on the second US and 11.4% on the third US. At 6 months, pelvic radiographs were available for 37 infants, none of whom showed DDH according to the Tönnis classification. However, 54.0% had significantly higher AI angles on the blunting side than on the contralateral side (mean difference, 3.5°; p = 0.012). No significant difference was found in the femoral head ossification center area (p = 0.712). Isolated acetabular edge blunting does not progress to DDH but is associated with slightly higher AI values, suggesting subtle variations in acetabular development. In follow-up protocols, a second US and follow-up with a pelvic radiograph at 6 months is sufficient instead of unnecessary repeated ultrasonography checks. Larger prospective studies are required to clarify the long-term clinical significance of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ülgen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: