Experimental investigations reveal discrepancies in airblast parameters between predictions and measurements, suggesting the need for updated models.
Experimental investigations were conducted to measure airblast parameters from TNT surface bursts at scaled distances of 0.94 to 6.79 m/kg1/3. Pressure-time histories of incident airblast waves were recorded using PCB sensors and processed to determine peak overpressure, impulse, and positive phase duration. These parameters were compared with Kingery-Bulmash(K-B) blast curves. Experimental peak overpressures were approximately 1.17 times higher than K-B predictions, while impulses showed excellent agreement(0.96 times K-B values). The elevated peak overpressures are likely due to improved precision in modern pressure sensors and digital data acquisition systems. These findings suggest that K-B blast parameters, limited by the technology of their time, require updating with data from contemporary instrumentation to enhance the accuracy of blast analysis and protective design applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: