Evaluates afterburning effects on pressure buildup in confined explosions, suggesting enhanced energy release.
Confined trinitrotoluene (TNT) explosions exhibit a short shock-dominated stage followed by a millisecond-scale quasi-static pressure rise driven by secondary combustion of detonation products. In such flows, repeated shock reflections, wave superposition, and the continued interfacial interaction between hot fuel-rich products and surrounding air govern the transition from an initially non-uniform compressible wave field to a late chamber-scale pressure buildup. In this work, these processes are modeled within a three-dimensional Euler framework solved by a Runge–Kutta discontinuous Galerkin method. Afterburning is represented by a single progress variable with a first-order rate law, interpreted as an effective chamber-scale closure for unresolved mixing-controlled energy release. The model is validated against nitrogen-filled chamber tests, in which afterburning is suppressed, and against air-filled chamber tests, in which afterburning raises the quasi-static plateau and accumulated impulse. For the present chamber, inversion of Unified Facilities Criteria quasi-static correlations gives afterburning energies about 80% higher for 90 g TNT and about 70% higher for 160 g TNT than a correlation derived from confined-explosion measurements; the latter is therefore adopted for subsequent analysis. With the calibrated rate constant, the predicted cumulative impulse in nitrogen is within about 3%–15% of the measurements, and the quasi-static plateaus and impulses in air are reproduced within about 5% over the tested charge masses. Parametric results show that afterburning has only a minor influence on the earliest shock peaks but substantially elevates the quasi-static pressure level while preserving the qualitative dependence of the loads on chamber volume, charge position, and charge mass.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: