Key result
Adding the Edmonton Frailty Scale to Euroscore II improves prognostic accuracy for major 1-year events.
Why the study?
Frailty is not routinely assessed or incorporated into the Euroscore II, and evidence regarding minimally invasive cardiac surgery in older frail adults remains limited.
Does frailty assessment improve the prognostic performance of Euroscore II, and does minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) improve outcomes in frail older adults undergoing valve surgery?
Observational (n=568)
No
Does frailty assessment improve the prognostic performance of Euroscore II, and does minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) improve outcomes in frail older adults undergoing valve surgery?
Preoperative frailty assessment, particularly using the Edmonton Frailty Scale, improves risk stratification beyond Euroscore II, and minimally invasive cardiac surgery may reduce mortality in frail older adults undergoing valve surgery.
Supports adding Edmonton Frailty Scale to EuroSCORE II for risk stratification in older valve patients; extends evidence and leaves MICS benefit hypothesis-generating in frail patients.
Frailty is not routinely assessed nor incorporated into the Euroscore II, and evidence on minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in older frail adults remains limited. We evaluated whether frailty assessment improves the prognostic performance of the Euroscore II and whether MICS provides benefits in frail patients. Patients aged ≥70 years undergoing valve surgery were assessed for frailty preoperatively. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year; the secondary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. A total of 568 patients were included (median age 76 years; median Euroscore II 2.3); 65.3% underwent elective surgery, and 63.4% MICS. For the primary endpoint, the Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) provided the greatest improvement when added to Euroscore II (Harrell’s C + 0.054, p < 0.05), followed by the Clinical Frailty Scale (+0.013, p < 0.05). For mortality, EFS showed the largest gain (+0.057, p < 0.05), followed by the Essential Frailty Toolset (+0.011, p < 0.05). In frail patients, MICS was protective for mortality but not for the composite endpoint. Frailty assessment, particularly EFS, improves risk stratification, and MICS may reduce mortality in frail older adults.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cimaglia et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Valvular heart disease (n=568). Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) assessment added to Euroscore II vs. Euroscore II alone was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or cardiovascular hospitalization at 1 year (Harrell's C +0.054, p=<0.001). The addition of the Edmonton Frailty Scale to Euroscore II significantly improved prognostic accuracy for 1-year mortality or cardiovascular hospitalization (Harrell's C +0.054, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: