Retrospective analysis investigates cognitive decline and peripheral markers in Alzheimer's disease, suggesting new biomarker potential.
Objective: To investigate the integrated relationship between Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (CSVD) markers and quantitative facial soft-tissue measurements in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum, utilizing peripheral muscle health as a potential biomarker for systemic frailty and neurodegeneration. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 3T brain MRI data from 67 patients (AD, N = 45; Mild Cognitive Impairment [MCI], N = 22). CSVD markers were assessed using STRIVE and standardized scales (Fazekas, Potter). Facial soft-tissue metrics, including masseter and tongue volume, temporal muscle thickness (TMT), and fat infiltration (Mercuri Scale), were quantified via semi-automatic segmentation on T1-weighted sequences. Group comparisons (AD vs. MCI) used regression models adjusted for age and sex. The overall central–peripheral relationship was explored via Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA). Results: The AD group showed a highly significant cognitive decline (MMSE: 23.2 ± 4.1 vs. 28.2 ± 1.4, p < 0.0001). Centrally, the presence of PVSs in the mesencephalic region was the most robust predictor for AD (p = 0.003). Peripherally, average masseter muscle volume was significantly lower in the AD group (p = 0.027 3), and masseter fat infiltration was significantly higher (p = 0.025), supporting localized sarcopenia. The CCA demonstrated a statistically significant positive multivariate relationship (r = 0.51, Roy’s Largest Root p = 0.015) between a higher combined CSVD burden and a worse soft tissue profile across the cohort. Conclusions: Quantitative indices of facial soft tissues, particularly masseter muscle volume and quality, reflect systemic frailty and cognitive deterioration along the AD continuum. The strong central–peripheral correlation suggests that sarcopenia and CSVD are interconnected manifestations of a shared pathobiological process. These easily measurable facial markers could serve as valuable, non-invasive peripheral biomarkers, complementing traditional neuroimaging risk stratification in AD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: