Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates remote coaching's impact on parent-infant communication in infants with hearing loss, suggesting effective intervention strategies.
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a remote parent coaching program for infants with hearing loss (HL) younger than 12 months and evaluate its multifaceted effects on both parents and infants.Methods: Five parent-infant dyads, consisting of infants aged 5-11 months and their mothers, participated in a remote parent coaching program. Joint attention, parental verbal responsiveness, parental linguistic input, and infant vocalization frequency were analyzed across three phases: pre-coaching, post-coaching, and maintenance. Parental knowledge, confidence, and behavior were assessed before and after the coaching using the Scale of Parental Involvement and Self-Efficacy-Revised-Korean version (SPISE-R-K).Results: Significant improvements were observed in joint attention ratio and parental verbal responsiveness during both the post-coaching and maintenance phases. Mean joint attention duration showed a significant increase at the maintenance stage. Regarding linguistic input, total utterances and total words significantly decreased following the coaching, whereas the number of different words did not show a significant change. Changes in infant vocalization frequency were not significant. Results from the SPISE-R-K indicated significant improvements in parental knowledge and behavior, while no significant change was found in parental confidence.Conclusion: These findings suggest that the remote parent coaching program is an effective early intervention for improving the quality of parent-infant interaction. By facilitating meaningful behavioral changes in parents and maintaining these effects over time, this program offers a feasible alternative approach that enhances both the accessibility and sustainability of early intervention services for infants with HL and their parents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: