Key result
Heparinized saline priming linked to ~48% lower filter clotting risk during nafamostat CRRT.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify risk factors affecting filter lifespan during continuous renal replacement therapy with nafamostat mesylate anticoagulation and to construct a Cox proportional hazards prediction model.
Can a Cox proportional hazards model accurately predict filter clotting in patients undergoing CRRT with nafamostat mesylate anticoagulation?
Observational (n=105)
No
Can a Cox proportional hazards model accurately predict filter clotting in patients undergoing CRRT with nafamostat mesylate anticoagulation?
Effect estimate: HR 0.517 (95% CI 0.381-0.703)
p-value: p=<0.001
A novel Cox proportional hazards prediction model and nomogram can effectively predict filter clotting events during CRRT with nafamostat mesylate.
May support risk stratification in nafamostat-CRRT; extends predictive modeling but leaves open utility pending external validation.
To identify risk factors affecting the filter lifespan during CRRT (continuous renal replacement therapy) with nafamostat mesylate anticoagulation and to construct a Cox proportional hazards prediction model. A total of 105 patients undergoing 230 CRRT sessions in our hospital between December 2023 and February 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictive variables, and a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was developed. A nomogram was constructed, and the model’s discriminatory ability and predictive performance were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In the univariable analysis, four variables were identified as significant predictors of filter clotting: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hematocrit (HCT), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and heparinized saline priming of the circuit. Other variables were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).Based on the variables included in the univariable analysis, together with one additional clinically relevant variable identified through literature review and expert consultation (subcutaneous injection of low-molecular-weight heparin, 4000 IU/day), a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was constructed and analyzed. The results showed that three variables remained statistically significant in the multivariable analysis and were identified as independent predictors, while APTT was not statistically significant in the multivariable model.The constructed nomogram demonstrated good predictive performance, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.791, 0.760, and 0.747 for predicting filter clotting risk at 24, 48, and 60 hours, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards prediction model was successfully developed for filter clotting during CRRT with NM anticoagulation. The model demonstrated good predictive performance and may help identify high-risk patients at an early stage, providing a valuable reference for preventing and managing filter clotting events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in High bleeding risk requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (n=105). Nafamostat mesylate was evaluated on Filter clotting requiring replacement (Grade III) (HR 0.517, 95% CI 0.381-0.703, p=<0.001). Heparinized saline priming (HR 0.517), diabetes mellitus (HR 1.362), and pretreatment hematocrit (HR 1.024) were identified as independent predictors of filter clotting during CRRT with nafamostat mesylate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: