Demonstrates ethical AI outcomes in emerging markets, indicating their role as innovative learning laboratories.
Globally, AI is increasingly shaping decisions in critical areas such as governance, finance, health care, and public service delivery. However, the rapid deployment of AI has also exposed serious ethical challenges such as privacy risks, algorithmic bias, lack of transparency, and weak accountability. This creates a critical problem: AI systems are often deployed globally without sufficient understanding of how ethical principles are translated into contexts marked by regulatory gaps, socio-economic diversity, and institutional fragility, which are common conditions in emerging markets. This study argues that emerging markets represent ideal real-world testbeds for ethical AI innovation rather than being peripheral or problematic environments. Their dynamic social structures, rapid digital adoption, and evolving governance systems make ethical challenges more visible, measurable, and actionable. This study synthesizes insights from ethical AI, socio-technical systems theory, and governance literature using a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework to examine how ethics, social impact, and governance interact in AI deployment across emerging economies from 2010 to 2021. The findings reveal that ethical failures are not solely technical problems but also socio-technical problems, arising from misalignment between AI systems and local realities. Ethical AI outcomes in emerging markets are strongly shaped by context-sensitive governance, inclusive stakeholder engagement, and HCD approaches. This study contributes a conceptual framework that links AI deployment with ethics, social impact, governance, and stakeholder engagement by positioning emerging markets as learning laboratories rather than late adopters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okolo et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: