PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2026International Journal of Cancer2 citations

Survival by Detection Pathway in Patients With Lung Cancer—A Nationwide Descriptive Epidemiological Study in Japan

View Full Paper
RKRyo KotoAYAtsuki YamamotoITIkumi Takashima

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the survival outcomes of lung cancer patients based on their detection pathway.
  • Analyzed patients from the Japanese National Cancer Registry recorded between 2016 and 2020.
  • Categorized patients into Screening, Incidental, and Other groups based on detection pathway.
  • Estimated 1, 2, and 3 year net survival rates for each group.
  • 3 year net survival was 75.2% in the Screening group, 56.3% in the Incidental group, and 29.4% in the Other group.
  • In patients with localized disease, the 3 year net survival was 96.3%, 83.9%, and 76.9% in the Screening, Incidental, and Other groups, respectively.
  • Screening significantly contributes to improved survival outcomes compared to other pathways.

Abstract

Greater understanding of the prognosis for patients with lung cancer in Japan according to detection pathway would clarify the effect of population-based screening programs and the related diagnostic environment. We explored the clinical characteristics and net survival (NS) of patients with lung cancer by detection pathway with Japanese National Cancer Registry (NCR) database of patients registered between 2016 and 2020. Eligible patients were categorized based on detection pathway: Screening, Incidental, and Other groups. We estimated 1, 2, and 3 year NS. Of 565,044 patients with lung cancer in the NCR, 563,244 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study: 95,081 patients in the Screening (16.9%), 254,569 in the Incidental (45.2%), and 200,850 in the Other groups (35.7%). In the Screening, Incidental, and Other groups, 69.5%, 88.6%, and 83.4% of patients, respectively, were aged ≥ 65 years, and 50.5%, 49.6%, and 14.0% of patients, respectively, had localized disease at diagnosis. The most common initial treatment was surgery in the Screening (62.5%) and Incidental (46.2%) groups, while chemotherapy was most frequently used in the Other group (48.6%). The 3 year NS was 75.2% (95% confidence interval: 74.9%-75.6%) in the Screening group, 56.3% (56.0%-56.6%) in the Incidental group, and 29.4% (29.2%-29.7%) in the Other group. In the subgroup analysis, 3 year NS for localized disease was 96.3% (95.9%-96.7%), 83.9% (83.6%-84.3%), and 76.9% (76.1%-77.6%), respectively, for the Screening, Incidental, and Other groups. Screening may play a key role in early detection and is likely to contribute to survival outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d9e6b078050d08c1b77009https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70474
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper