I defend the principle of Phenomenal Conservatism, on which appearances of all kinds generate at least some justification for belief. I argue that there is no reason for privileging introspection or intuition over perceptual experience as a source of justified belief; that those who deny Phenomenal Conservatism are in a self‐defeating position, in that their view cannot be both true and justified; and that the demand for a metajustification for Phenomenal Conservatism either is an easily met demand, or is an unfair or question‐begging one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Huemer (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: