Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ru/TiO₂ catalysts exhibit an exceptionally high activity in the selective methanation of CO in CO₂ - and H₂ -rich reformates, but suffer from continuous deactivation during reaction. This limitation can be overcome through the fabrication of highly active and non-deactivating Ru/TiO₂ catalysts by engineering the morphology of the TiO₂ support. Using anatase TiO₂ nanocrystals with mainly {001}, {100}, or {101} facets exposed, we show that after an initial activation period Ru/TiO₂ -{100} and Ru/TiO₂ -{101} are very stable, while Ru/TiO₂ -{001} deactivates continuously. Employing different operando/in situ spectroscopies and ex situ characterizations, we show that differences in the catalytic stability are related to differences in the metal-support interactions (MSIs). The stronger MSIs on the defect-rich TiO₂ -{100} and TiO₂ -{101} supports stabilize flat Ru nanoparticles, while on TiO₂ -{001} hemispherical particles develop. The former MSIs also lead to electronic modifications of Ru surface atoms, reflected by the stronger bonding of adsorbed CO on those catalysts than on Ru/TiO₂ -{001}.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: