Why the study?
Does early-generation TAVR compared to SAVR improve structural durability and reduce regurgitation or reintervention in patients undergoing heart valve surgery?
Does early-generation TAVR compared to SAVR improve structural durability and reduce regurgitation or reintervention in patients undergoing heart valve surgery?
Early-generation TAVR valves show greater susceptibility to structural valve deterioration and higher reintervention rates up to 5 years compared to SAVR.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early-generation TAVR warrants durability caution in valve selection; confirms higher regurgitation and reintervention risks versus SAVR through 5 years.
TAVR valves appear to be more susceptible to structural valve deterioration and thus potentially less structurally durable than SAVR valves, given that they may be associated with higher rates of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, paravalvular regurgitation and reintervention in the 1-year-, 2-3 year, and 5-year period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ler et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: