Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The identification of physiological traits that determine grain number (and yield) in modern cultivars, and the possible tradeoffs among them, may help to detect promising traits for breeding to increase yield potential. High‐yielding Argentinean wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars were grown under irrigated and high‐input conditions during two seasons to study (i) yield and grain number m −2 (GN) as a result of stover biomass at harvest (SH) and harvest index (HI); and (ii) spike dry weight at anthesis (SDW a ; g m −2 ) and spike fertility index (SFI; grain number per gram of spike chaff or non‐grain spike biomass). Duration of the stem elongation phase (SEP; first node detectable to anthesis) was analyzed as an alternative to increase SDW a . The HI was highly associated with yield differences between cultivars for both years, independently of stem height. In contrast, SH did not vary among cultivars in either season ( P > 0.05). The GN determined yield differences between cultivars and was highly associated with SFI and SDW a for both years and cycles. Some cultivars with the same anthesis date showed stable variation for duration of the SEP between years (despite the year × cultivar interaction observed). As the SFI and duration of the SEP were not related, it seems promising to increase GN in a cultivar with high SFI through an increased duration of the SEP (which may yield higher SWD a ) or vice versa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: