This review summarizes various stroke and bleeding risk scores for atrial fibrillation, highlighting CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED as the primary tools recommended by European guidelines.
CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED remain preferred for AF risk stratification; confirms European guidelines but leaves open refinement in contemporary cohorts.
Stroke prevention is central to the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). As effective stroke prophylaxis essentially requires oral anticoagulants, an understanding of the risks and benefits of oral anticoagulant therapy is needed. Although AF increases stroke risk 5-fold, this risk is not homogeneous. Many stroke risk factors also confer an increased risk of bleeding. Various stroke and bleeding risk-stratification schemes have been developed to help inform clinical decision-making. These scores were derived and validated in different study cohorts, ranging from highly selected clinical-trial cohorts to real-world populations. Thus, their performance and classification accuracy vary depending on their derivation cohort(s). In the present review, we provide an overview of currently available stroke and bleeding risk-stratification schemes. We particularly focus on the CHA2 DS2 -VASc and HAS-BLED schemes, as these are recommended by the latest European guidelines on AF management. Other risk-stratification schemes (eg, CHADS2 , R2 CHADS2 , ATRIA, HEMORR2 HAGES, QStroke) and their place in the decision-making are also considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dzeshka et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: