Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Civil service reforms implemented over the past 35 years in many countries around the world have relaxed traditional merit system rules, decentralized the personnel function, and augmented agency and managerial discretion. One objective of these reforms has been to boost government productivity and increase the efficiency of core personnel management functions such as hiring and firing employees, but much of the available evidence suggests that reforms commonly implemented may serve political or ideological objectives better than performance-related goals. We argue for a fuller appreciation of the political motivations for reforms and a broader understanding of their implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brewer et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: