Why the study?
Radiologists play a key role in the multidisciplinary evaluation of pulmonary hypertension, but guidance was needed on the utility of noninvasive imaging across recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up.
What is the role of noninvasive imaging (CT, MRI, nuclear medicine) in the evaluation and management of adults with pulmonary hypertension?
What is the role of noninvasive imaging (CT, MRI, nuclear medicine) in the evaluation and management of adults with pulmonary hypertension?
This position paper outlines the critical role of CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine in the comprehensive multidisciplinary management of pulmonary hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrates CT, MRI, and nuclear imaging into PH pathways now; extends consensus guidelines for multidisciplinary evaluation.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mmHg and classified into five different groups sharing similar pathophysiologic mechanisms, haemodynamic characteristics, and therapeutic management. Radiologists play a key role in the multidisciplinary assessment and management of PH. A working group was formed from within the Fleischner Society based on expertise in the imaging and/or management of patients with PH, as well as experience with methodologies of systematic reviews. The working group identified key questions focusing on the utility of CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine in the evaluation of PH: a) Is noninvasive imaging capable of identifying PH? b) What is the role of imaging in establishing the cause of PH? c) How does imaging determine the severity and complications of PH? d) How should imaging be used to assess chronic thromboembolic PH before treatment? e) Should imaging be performed after treatment of PH? This systematic review and position paper highlights the key role of imaging in the recognition, work-up, treatment planning, and follow-up of PH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rémy‐Jardin et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: