PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 5, 2017Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics136 citations

Is rocking motion predictable?

View Full Paper
JBJonas A. BachmannMSMorten K. StrandMVMichalis F. Vassiliou

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Summary An argument of engineers and researchers against the use of rocking as a seismic response modification technique is that the rocking motion of a structure is chaotic and the existing models are incapable of predicting it well. This argument is supported by the documented inability of rocking models to predict the motion of a specimen excited by a single ground motion. A statistical comparison of the experimental and the numerical responses of a rigid rocking oscillator not to a specific ground motion, but to ensembles of ground motions that have the same statistical properties, is presented. It is shown that the simple analytical model proposed by Housner in 1963 is capable of predicting the statistics of seismic response of a rigid rocking oscillator.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bachmann et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69daa53b3bc1ef72256845b7https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2978
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper