Why the study?
Conventional sphygmomanometry has low reproducibility and marked variability, whereas evaluating arterial stiffness via carotid pulse wave analysis may improve hemodynamic and cardiovascular risk assessment.
Does carotid pulse wave analysis provide reliable assessment of central pressures and cardiovascular risk compared to conventional sphygmomanometry?
Does carotid pulse wave analysis provide reliable assessment of central pressures and cardiovascular risk compared to conventional sphygmomanometry?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carotid pulse wave analysis using wearable sensors offers a reliable, noninvasive alternative to conventional sphygmomanometry for assessing arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk.
Evaluation of the hemodynamic function of the cardiovascular system via measurement of the mechanical properties of the large arteries may provide a substantial improvement over present techniques. Practitioners are familiar with the problem of low reproducibility of conventional sphygmomanometry, which exhibits reasonable accuracy but low precision owing to its marked variability over time and in different circumstances (e.g., the white coat effect). Arterial wall stiffness is a consequence of atherosclerosis developing over time; thus, it has little short-term variability and is thus preferable to be used as a prognostic marker. In particular, arterial stiffness can be evaluated at the carotid artery using noninvasive approaches based on wearable sensor technologies for pulse wave analysis. These enable the assessment of central pressures and pulse waveform parameters that are expected to replace peripheral blood pressure measurement using the inflatable cuff. In this study, we discuss this simple and inexpensive technique, which has been shown to be reliable with the clinical and epidemiological evidence for its use as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parittotokkaporn et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: