Why the study?
What are the benefits and safety of achieving very low (10-40 mg/dL) LDL-C levels in secondary prevention of ASCVD?
What are the benefits and safety of achieving very low (10-40 mg/dL) LDL-C levels in secondary prevention of ASCVD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This editorial discusses emerging evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of achieving very low LDL-C levels (10-40 mg/dL) for secondary prevention of ASCVD.
Reducing low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been a cornerstone of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction for over three decades. 1Guidelines from the US and Europe have delineated algorithms for LDL-C targeting, generally advocating for progressively lower values over time, tracking with the development of new therapies and evolving trial data. 2, 3However, along with the ability to achieve substantially lower LDL-C values has emerged a critical question-what are the benefits and safety of very low (10-40 mg/dL) LDL-C?Since their FDA approval in the late 1980's, statins have been the primary LDL-C reducing therapy in clinical practice.A central tenet that has emerged from over 20 statin randomized trials evaluated in a Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) meta-analysis is that for every 39 mg/dL (1mmol/L) LDL-C reduction with statins there is a 21% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). 4Early statin clinical trials largely applied low and moderate-intensity statins, with the first two trials achieving LDL-C values of 122 mg/dL and 98 mg/dL, respectively. 5,6 ccordingly, the US National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP) revised recommendations for LDL-C goals from <130 mg/dL in secondary prevention in ATP I published in 1998 to <100 mg/dL in ATP II published in 1993.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodríguez et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: