This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Statistical aspects of 'biological effects' field surveys are discussed, with particular reference to the GEEP Workshop. Recommendations are made on design criteria, for example, selection of sites and samples, and replication strategies (including formulae for sample size determination) The role of transforinations is discussed, both for univariate sub-lethal response data and the mulbvariate data arising from benthic community studies. Statistical analysis is categorised into testing methods, for establishing biological differences between field sites, and descriptive techniques, for representation of those differences. The former includes a non-parametric randomisation test for use with site-species arrays and the latter a survey of various multivariate ordination and clustering methods A final section outlines a procedure for comparison of different pollution indices, combining their power to detect specific contaminant inputs with their associated 'costs'
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clarke et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: