Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The possibility of modulating the treatment regimen regarding dose reduction (de-escalation) or dose augmentation (escalation) in psoriasis biological treatment has been of increasing interest. De-escalation strategies include reducing the single therapeutic dose, the mg/kg ratio or the number of injections, or dose-spacing (D-S), that is, extending the interval between administrations. Data regarding dose de-escalation, in particular D-S, on IL-23, are lacking to date. The present pilot study is a cohort study with a retrospective analysis of the general characteristics and effectiveness outcomes of psoriatic patients undergoing therapeutic biologic D-S of risankizumab and guselkumab. Ninety-four patients, 32 (34.04%) treated with guselkumab and 62 (65.96%) treated with risankizumab, underwent dose modulation by D-S of 50% of the approved range. The mean PASI decreased from 12.15 (5.43 SD) to 0.15 (0.46 SD) at D-S time. Attainment of PASI100 was rapid: 88.3% at the D-S date, remaining stable over the following year, reaching 100% of patients observed 12 months after D-S. Similar is the trend for PASI 90 and PASI <=1 with 91.49% and 97.87% of achievement at D-S date, and all patients observed at 12 months post-D-S. The 12-month drug survival of the D-S regimen was 89.4%. Guselkumab showed a D-S drug survival of 93.3% versus 89.5% of risankizumab. No differences in mean PASIs at each time point were found between guselkumab and risankizumab. To conclude therapeutic modulation of IL-23 inhibitors in psoriatic patients who have achieved response stability seems a legitimate therapeutic strategy to maintain efficacy and safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mastorino et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: