Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The tris(solvent) complexes [M(C5H5)(S)3][PF6]2(M = Rh, Ir; s = Me2CN, Me2SO, or pyridine) were prepared and characterised; evidence for less stable solvent complexes (M = Rh, Ir; s = Me2CO, MeOH, or CH2Cl2) was obtained. The dicationic RhIII and IrIIIη6-arene complexes [M(C5Me5)(arene)][PF6]2(M = Rh: arene = benzene, toluene, m-xylene, mesitylene, fluorene, or indole; M = Ir, arene = toluene, m-xylene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, indene, indole, or fluorene) were synthesised from the acetone solvent complexes (IVa; M = Rh)(IVa: M = Ir). Both the naphthalene- and phenanthrene-iridium complexes were very labile, but showed no evidence of fluxional behaviour; phenanthrene is bonded by the terminal 6-membered ring. Reaction of (IVa) with indene gave the η5-indenyl complex, [Rh(C5Me5)(C9H7)][PF6], which was protonated, with rearrangement, to the η5-indene complex. Similar reversible protonation–deprotonation reactions occurred for the iridium complexes, [Ir(C5Me5)(η6-C9H8)]2+⇌[Ir(C5Me5)(η5-C9H7)]++ H+. The iridium (but not the rhodium)-indole complex [Ir(C5Me5)(η6-C8H6NH)]2+ also underwent reversible deprotonation to the η5-indolyl complex [Ir(C5Me5)(η5-C8H6N)]+. From exchange studies with CF3CO2D on [Ir(C5Me5)(η6-C7H8)]2+ it is concluded that protonation/deprotonation is fast and that the rate-determming step in the overall reaction is the movement of the metal from the 5- to the 6-membered ring and vice versa. The η6-fluorene-rhodium complex is very labile but the iridium analogue is deprotonated by base to give a fluorenyl complex of undetermined structure. An order of stability of η5- and η6-arenes bonded to RhIII and IrIII is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: