Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multi-objective optimization has been widely used in evolutionary computation for solving problems in which two or more conflicting objectives need to be optimized in a simultaneous fashion. This paper presents a multi-objective hyper-heuristic based on evolutionary algorithms that automatically designs complete decision-tree induction algorithms. Such algorithms are designed to generate decision trees that present an interesting trade-off between predictive performance and complexity. The proposed approach is tested over 20 UCI datasets, and it is compared with a single-objective hyper-heuristic as well as with traditional decision-tree induction algorithms. Experimental results show that the proposed approach can match the top predictive performance achieved by the baseline methods, without significant loss in model comprehensibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basgalupp et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: