Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ab initio calculations at the G2, G3, and CBS-Q levels of theory have been applied to the question of the origin of ring strain in a series of unsaturated hydrocarbons. In addition to the angular ring strain germane to all three-membered ring hydrocarbons, a general trend is in evidence that suggests that the increased ring strain (SE) of unsaturated small ring alkenes may be attributed in part to their relatively weak allylic C-H bonds. The high strain energy of cyclopropene (54.1 kcal/ mol) is attributed largely to angular strain. The anomalously low SE of cyclobutene relative to cyclobutane (DeltaSE = 4 kcal/mol) is a consequence of normal C-H bond dissociation energies for cyclobutane (100.6 kcal/mol) and very strong vinyl C-H bonds (111.9 kcal/mol) and a relatively strong pi-bond energy (63.5 kcal/mol) for cyclobutene. The greater SE of methylenecyclopropane (39.5 kcal/ mol), relative to methylcyclopropane (29.8 kcal/mol), can be attributed to the strong ring C-H bonds of methylcyclopropane (110.5 kcal/mol) and relatively weak allylic C-H bonds (99.3 kcal/mol) of methylenecyclopropane. The increased SE of 1-methylcyclopropene relative to isomeric methylenecyclopropane is ascribed to its weak ring C-H bonds and to angular strain. The relative thermodynamic stability of a series of small ring alkenes is determined by a measure of their hydrogenation enthalpies. Independent confirmation of the SEs of a series of substituted cyclopropenes is provided by their dimerization/combination with cyclopropane to form a six-membered ring reference compound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bach et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: