Why the study?
Diagnosing diastolic dysfunction post-Fontan palliation is challenging despite universal predisposition.
Does exercise invasive haemodynamics reveal differences in pulmonary artery wedge pressure and ΔPAWP/ΔQs between adults post-Fontan, HFpEF, and non-cardiac dyspnoea?
Does exercise invasive haemodynamics reveal differences in pulmonary artery wedge pressure and ΔPAWP/ΔQs between adults post-Fontan, HFpEF, and non-cardiac dyspnoea?
Exercise invasive haemodynamics demonstrate that adults post-Fontan have abnormal single ventricle compliance comparable to patients with HFpEF, suggesting its utility as a novel diagnostic tool for diastolic dysfunction in this population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support exercise haemodynamics for assessing diastolic dysfunction post-Fontan similar to HFpEF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Aims Despite their universal predisposition, diagnosing diastolic dysfunction in patients post-Fontan palliation is challenging. Our aim was to compare exercise haemodynamics between adults post-Fontan and patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and non-cardiac dyspnoea (NCD). Methods and results Twenty-four adults (age ≥18 years) post-Fontan palliation with resting and exercise pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) measured during supine biking were identified. Forty-eight patients with HFpEF and 48 with NCD diagnosed at catheterization were selected for comparison. Mean age for Fontan patients was 30.3 ± 7.5 years; median ventricular ejection fraction was 52.5% (45–55.8), being <50% in 37.5%. Resting PAWP among Fontan patients was 10.2 ± 3.5 mmHg (>12 mmHg in 25%); PAWP was lower in Fontan patients than in HFpEF but higher than NCD. During exercise, PAWP was lower in the Fontan group than HFpEF (22.5 mmHg [19.3–28] vs. 28.2 ± 6.3; p = 0.0006) but higher than NCD (11.2 ± 4.2, p ≤ 0.0001). However, there were no differences in ΔPAWP/ΔQs between Fontan and HFpEF patients (4.0 [2.1–7.3] vs. 2.7 [1.6–4.4]; p = 0.10) with the ratio being higher post-Fontan than in NCD (0.6 [0.2–1.2]; p < 0.0001). ΔPAWP/ΔQs remained similar between HFpEF and Fontan patients even when those with ejection fraction <50% were excluded (2.7 [1.6–4.4] vs. 2.7 [1.0–5.8]; p = 0.97). Conclusion There were no differences in ΔPAWP/ΔQs ratios between post-Fontan and HFpEF patients, supporting markedly abnormal single ventricle compliance despite lower resting and exercise PAWP. Therefore, exercise invasive haemodynamics may represent a novel tool for the diagnosis of diastolic dysfunction in Fontan patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: