⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

August 1, 2010Plastic & Reconstructive SurgeryOpen Access

Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Design

Review

Authors

CPChristopher J. PannucciMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center EWEdwin G. WilkinsUniversity of Michigan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Clinicians must scrutinize literature for bias in evidence appraisal; this review extends bias identification across all research phases.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Pannucci et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db23180d8d6ef495a3cfc1 https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181de24bc

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A Population-Based Perspective of the Hospital Incidence and Case-Fatality Rates of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism1991 · 1,678 citations
2The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2001 · 2,562 citations
3Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity2003 · 510 citations
4Preoperative Computed Tomographic Angiogram for Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction2009 · 106 citations
5Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe Stenosis1998 · 3,624 citations