PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 12, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Permitting and siting of wind and solar in Massachusetts: processes, timelines, and outcomes

View Full Paper
NBNatalie BaillargeonUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstJKJuniper KatzUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstLTLanbing TaoBerkeley Systems (United States)

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze the permitting processes and durations for wind and solar projects in Massachusetts to inform policy and administration.
  • Created an original dataset of locally-permitted wind and solar energy projects in Massachusetts.
  • Analyzed permitting timelines for these projects.
  • Examined associations between project capacity and permitting duration.
  • Average permitting duration for projects was 250 days.
  • Increased permitting duration noted over time.
  • Smaller capacity projects had shorter permitting durations, while larger projects faced longer timelines.

Abstract

Permitting reform, shaped by local and state governance, could eliminate unnecessary administrative burdens that slow the development of new electricity generation. However, the permitting process or duration is not well known, especially for locally-permitted projects, which are the standard in the U.S. Northeast and the most common permitting type in the United States. Here, we create an original data set of locally-permitted wind and solar energy projects in Massachusetts to document those timelines. We find that, on average, the permitting duration lasted 250 days, and this duration has increased over time. Permitted and lower capacity projects were associated with shorter permitting duration while canceled and larger capacity projects are associated with longer permitting duration. The results represent the first attempt to calculate permitting speed for locally-permitted wind and solar energy projects at a time when several states are reforming permitting policies, including Massachusetts. This study, therefore, contributes to both the academic and policy debates about how to balance fast deployment with fair practices that weigh the concerns of local communities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Baillargeon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69db35be4fe01fead37c44fchttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsuep.2026.1771870
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper