Monitoring reveals hydrological and microbial improvements in extensive green roofs with sewage sludge biochar amendment.
Sewage sludge biochar (SSB) represents a circular material with the potential to improve the ecological performance of extensive green roofs and valorize nutrient-rich waste streams. Here, we report a 40-month rooftop monitoring experiment under temperate conditions evaluating the effects of SSB incorporation (10% and 20% v/v) on substrate properties, hydrological performance, runoff quality, vegetation development, and microbial diversity. SSB amendment reduced bulk density and increased total porosity and water-holding capacity, resulting in higher substrate moisture availability. These changes led to improved water retention, with annual runoff reduced by 3.3-8.5%, with the highest reduction observed in the SB20 treatment during the driest year (2022), and cumulative seasonal retention reaching 76% during dry years. Despite the nutrient-rich origin of SSB, runoff nutrient concentrations exhibited initial increases and subsequent stabilization, consistent with gradual nutrient release dynamics. Vegetation cover reached to 73% in the control and to 84% (SB20) and 89% (SB10) over the study period, with no significant difference between the two amendment rates. Microbial analyses revealed higher bacterial and fungal richness in SSB treatments, particularly at 20% v/v. Structural equation modelling indicated that variation in microbial richness was associated with changes in runoff chemistry (pH, electric conductivity, total suspended solids) and interannual dynamics, rather than effects explained by a single factor. Overall, this study provides evidence from extended rooftop monitoring, highlighting long-term system responses of extensive green roofs amended with SSB, particularly regarding water balance, substrate physical development, and microbial diversity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vavrincová et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: