This review compares phase change materials for improving thermal performance in solar desalination, suggesting effective options for enhancing water production.
Global water scarcity has intensified the need for sustainable freshwater production technologies. Solar stills offer a cost-effective desalination option, yet their limited productivity and dependence on daytime solar irradiance restrict deployment. Thermal energy storage using phase change materials (PCMs) has emerged as a promising strategy to extend freshwater production beyond daylight hours. However, existing reviews overlook systematic links between PCM properties and solar still operational constraints. This review compares eight PCM families — paraffins, fatty acids, alcohols, glycols, esters, hydrated salts, molten salts, and metallic alloys — against melting temperature compatibility with the 40–80 °C operating range, latent heat capacity, thermal conductivity, and long-term cycling stability, based on 167 peer-reviewed articles (2000–2024). Key findings: paraffins and fatty acids, with melting points of 6–71 °C and 47–70 °C and latent heats of 80–269 J g⁻¹, are the most viable PCMs for passive solar stills despite thermal conductivities below 0.35 W m⁻¹ K⁻¹; hydrated salts are suitable if phase segregation and supercooling are mitigated; molten salts and metallic alloys are thermally incompatible with conventional passive systems. A multi-criteria weighted decision matrix is proposed to guide PCM selection, with future research directions including nanocomposite PCMs, cascaded thermal storage, and pilot-scale validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moumine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: