Key result
Trabectedin plus regional hyperthermia shows no benefit over trabectedin alone for PFS in advanced sarcoma.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of adding regional hyperthermia to trabectedin compared with trabectedin alone in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
Does trabectedin plus regional hyperthermia improve progression-free survival in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma compared to trabectedin alone?
Does trabectedin plus regional hyperthermia improve progression-free survival in adults with advanced soft tissue sarcoma compared to trabectedin alone?
Adding regional hyperthermia to trabectedin did not improve progression-free survival in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
Reinforces trabectedin monotherapy as standard in advanced soft tissue sarcoma; challenges added value of regional hyperthermia.
Background The German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG) assessed efficacy and safety of trabectedin plus regional hyperthermia (Tr + RHT) versus trabectedin (Tr) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and methods In this randomized, open-label, multicenter study, adults with advanced STS who had progressed after at least one line of anthracycline-based chemotherapy or were unsuited for this treatment were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive Tr + RHT or Tr every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included histological subtype, prior surgery (at any time), metastatic status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) analyzed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Results Between 19 December 2014 and 7 December 2021, 118 eligible patients from five GISG centers were allocated to Tr + RHT (n = 60) or Tr (n = 58). Patients received a median of three cycles [interquartile range (IQR) 2-6.2 cycles] in the Tr + RHT arm and four cycles (IQR 2-6 cycles) in the Tr arm. Median PFS was 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-5.0 months] with Tr + RHT versus 3.5 months (95% CI 2.8-5.9 months) with Tr (stratified HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57-1.29, P = 0.459). In a Cox proportional hazards model, patients receiving five or more cycles showed a median PFS of 12.8 months (95% CI 9.8-21.0 months) with Tr + RHT versus 7.8 months (95% CI 6.0-12.6 months) with Tr (stratified HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.86, P = 0.023). Most commonly reported grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were hematologic, hepatic, and infections. Treatment-related deaths were reported in three patients (5.3%) of the Tr arm. Conclusions Adding RHT to trabectedin did not improve PFS. Although the study was negative, a post hoc exploratory analysis of the subgroup of patients receiving ≥5 cycles of Tr + RHT showed an improvement in PFS. The combination had a manageable safety profile, serving as the basis for a subsequent study on maintenance therapy with trabectedin or lurbinectedin plus RHT in advanced STS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuebbe et al. (2026) studied this question. Trabectedin plus regional hyperthermia did not significantly improve median progression-free survival (3.0 vs 3.5 months, HR 0.86) compared to trabectedin alone in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: