This meta-analysis evaluates inflammatory–oxidative stress biomarkers predicting adverse outcomes in coronary patients, suggesting their utility in risk assessment.
Acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remain at high risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke). Inflammatory–oxidative stress biomarkers are potential prognostic tools; however, the influence of sampling timing—pre-procedural versus post-procedural—remains unclear. This meta-analysis evaluated six biomarkers: sST2, GDF-15, OPG, sLOX-1, H-FABP, and Galectin-3. Pooled Hazard Ratios (HRs) for time-to-event outcomes and Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) between event and non-event groups were synthesized using random-effects models involving 40 studies (18,933 patients). Elevated pre-procedural levels of sST2 (HR = 3.32, p < 0.0001), GDF-15 (HR = 3.00, p < 0.0001), sLOX-1 (HR = 2.61, p = 0.0023), and OPG (HR = 1.79, p = 0.0206) significantly predicted MACE. Notably, pre-PCI sST2 strongly predicted heart failure hospitalization (HR = 6.30, p < 0.0001). Additionally, pre-PCI H-FABP demonstrated a moderate significant effect on adverse outcomes (SMD = 0.67, p < 0.0001). While pre-PCI Galectin-3 was not significant, its post-procedural levels showed a large significant effect (SMD = 1.15, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, particularly sST2 and GDF-15, demonstrate consistent associations with adverse outcomes in ACS patients undergoing PCI, offering more reliable baseline risk stratification than post-procedural measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tambunan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: